Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: My first sunrise  (Read 511 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tracey
Administrator
Snap happy
*****
Posts: 751


chief cook and bottle washer


WWW
« on: October 19, 2009, 11:11:13 AM »

Looking for some feedback on what I could do different with this, suggestions for improvement etc. I didnt get much feedback on the OU course, so wondered what was wrong with it Cry
Logged

trying to make sense of it all confused
Hedgehog
Global Moderator
Snap happy
****
Posts: 298


Wanna see my Canon?


WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2009, 12:54:01 PM »

thumbup It's a fine shot of a sunrise... beautiful colours... but that's it confused ... it needs something for it to be rising over... there's no story... nothing for ones imagination... no subject. A lone tree silhouetted, a milkman doing his rounds, a cow, a car, a steeple... something... maybe even focusing on the TV aerial might have worked.
Logged

XP sp3 IE 8, Vista IE8/FF 3.0.11
50D, 350D, ef50 1.8, efs10-22, Sigma 30 1.4, Tamron 18-200
Reminder... Jonesy's bananas... & nuts!
Tracey
Administrator
Snap happy
*****
Posts: 751


chief cook and bottle washer


WWW
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2009, 01:31:20 PM »

Hmm, I'll have to hope for a few more sunrises like this. Now you have said that, I see what you mean, I think I need to see what I can work out. Unfortunately, we have no cows walk down the road here... I think I need to improvise
Logged

trying to make sense of it all confused
Grendel
Global Moderator
Snap happy
****
Posts: 207



« Reply #3 on: October 19, 2009, 02:31:10 PM »

As the prickley one says you need a silhouette to make a good sunrise or sunset, take my 'liquid gold' picture ( http://www.travelthrutime.com/Photo/Liquid-Gold-P1056.php) without the figures its just another sunset, the figures bring more to the picture.
I had another in the same batch where there was a seagull just alighting wings outstretched right where the water and land merged, which was quite good, but didnt have the impact of this one. you have underexposed enough to get the stunning colours in the clouds (essential from my point of view, sunrises and sunsets, always two stops below what the camera thinks is right, brings out the tonal qualities in the golden colours. there was one location I could only get a shot twice a year, an oast house with two tops close together and the moon would rise between the two tops, you could capture the moon with the steering vane of the oast chimney (a kent horse prancing) right over the moon, always a stunning shot, just a shame when it was cloudy on the day.
This is the location with the moon in the approximate spot, now imagine a tight zoom on the two oasts with the moon behind one of the vanes and the silhouette of a prancing horse over the moon.
Grendel
« Last Edit: October 19, 2009, 02:39:37 PM by Grendel » Logged
Tracey
Administrator
Snap happy
*****
Posts: 751


chief cook and bottle washer


WWW
« Reply #4 on: October 19, 2009, 03:28:44 PM »

Thanks Grendel. Looks like I might have to leave my house next time I want to take a sunrise Smiley

This one was pretty much a "oh wow, look at the clouds" when I woke up one morning, grab the camera and shoot before the clouds disappeared or the sun came up too much Smiley
Logged

trying to make sense of it all confused
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to: