Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 128GB Flash Drive!  (Read 627 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hedgehog
Global Moderator
Snap happy
****
Posts: 298


Wanna see my Canon?


WWW
« on: June 30, 2009, 11:53:58 AM »

When I'm travelling abroad I used to carry about a conventional 80gig hard-drive to back-up my photo's but this is crazy...

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0906/09061702kingston128gbusb.asp

... thing is, the reason I use small CF cards in the camera is that if one goes wrong I don't lose too many photo's (I actually alternate them in my camera day-to-day so I don't lose an entire country if one goes pop)... so would this, as a back-up, be more reliable than a conventional drive?... I think it'd be able to take more abuse (shock/heat etc)... & it's lighter in my backpack... could be handy confused
Logged

XP sp3 IE 8, Vista IE8/FF 3.0.11
50D, 350D, ef50 1.8, efs10-22, Sigma 30 1.4, Tamron 18-200
Reminder... Jonesy's bananas... & nuts!
Tracey
Administrator
Snap happy
*****
Posts: 753


chief cook and bottle washer


WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2009, 12:09:34 PM »

Is that really as small as it looks?  Huh? (about the size of a normal USB drive)

I think I'd rather carry a couple of the smaller 32 or 64Gb ones as a method of backing up while I was travelling away... "just in case"
Logged

trying to make sense of it all confused
Ed Geraghty
Code-Monkey in Chief
Administrator
Snap happy
*****
Posts: leet


I am the Ballmer Peak in action


WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2009, 02:12:43 PM »

Well solid state stuff can take a MUCH bigger battering than your more "conventional" hard drives, however it's still a single point of failure.  I try personally to not rely on having stuff in only one place if it's important to me.

Another inhibiting factor may be the (what I assume will be) ridiculously high price.
Logged

Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.12
GCS d? s: a-- C+++ UBLS P L++(+) E--- W+++$ !N !o K? w+++$ !O---- M--
!V- PS+ PE++ Y++ PGP t- 5- X++ R* tv b DI++ G e++ h- r% y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Tracey
Administrator
Snap happy
*****
Posts: 753


chief cook and bottle washer


WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2009, 02:21:14 PM »

Another inhibiting factor may be the (what I assume will be) ridiculously high price.
I think that may be the case as the report says all the 128GB flash drives are to be special build/special order... however, if someone were to offer to buy me one, I wouldnt say no  angelnot
Logged

trying to make sense of it all confused
Hedgehog
Global Moderator
Snap happy
****
Posts: 298


Wanna see my Canon?


WWW
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2009, 02:47:59 PM »

Yeah... in real terms I'd go for a 32gig (or 2 on the eggs/basket principle) if I was going travelling for a while now. Expensive now but these things will be given away free in xmas crackers in a couple of years the rate things are changing... but then I'll need something a bit bigger when I've got a 6 gigapixel holographic Camera... what will I do with my old 2D lenses? Roll Eyes
Logged

XP sp3 IE 8, Vista IE8/FF 3.0.11
50D, 350D, ef50 1.8, efs10-22, Sigma 30 1.4, Tamron 18-200
Reminder... Jonesy's bananas... & nuts!
Alan Cullen
Underexposed

Posts: 37


I'm me. I ain't gonna change.


« Reply #5 on: July 02, 2009, 01:43:53 PM »

While in Mexico, we had two 2 gig chips for the camera. We never needed any more than that. Every night Zars would download the photos onto a laptop HD and also onto 8 gig sticks. When we got back to Lazaro Cardenas Zars would burn the photos onto DVDs. We never lost a single photo doing it that way. Lotta mucking around, but it worked.
Logged

So I like women in wetsuits. They just look so........fishy!
Tracey
Administrator
Snap happy
*****
Posts: 753


chief cook and bottle washer


WWW
« Reply #6 on: July 02, 2009, 01:52:00 PM »

We did something similar when we went to the US... but we didnt have the luxury of a DVD writer, so all the photos were backed up onto USB sticks.
I dont know whether I prefer carrying multiple small capacity USB sticks or one or two bigger ones
Logged

trying to make sense of it all confused
Alan Cullen
Underexposed

Posts: 37


I'm me. I ain't gonna change.


« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2009, 02:02:02 PM »

IMHO...lots of smaller ones are better. Hell they aren't that big!!!
Logged

So I like women in wetsuits. They just look so........fishy!
Ed Geraghty
Code-Monkey in Chief
Administrator
Snap happy
*****
Posts: leet


I am the Ballmer Peak in action


WWW
« Reply #8 on: July 07, 2009, 12:56:26 PM »

Well the current price for a 32GB Kingston Flash drive is £41+VAT.  Not bad in my eyes.
Logged

Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.12
GCS d? s: a-- C+++ UBLS P L++(+) E--- W+++$ !N !o K? w+++$ !O---- M--
!V- PS+ PE++ Y++ PGP t- 5- X++ R* tv b DI++ G e++ h- r% y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Hedgehog
Global Moderator
Snap happy
****
Posts: 298


Wanna see my Canon?


WWW
« Reply #9 on: July 07, 2009, 01:44:02 PM »

So that's still not far off a quid a gig which is pretty much what I paid for smaller ones recently... not bad.
Logged

XP sp3 IE 8, Vista IE8/FF 3.0.11
50D, 350D, ef50 1.8, efs10-22, Sigma 30 1.4, Tamron 18-200
Reminder... Jonesy's bananas... & nuts!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to: