Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Copyright reform for photographers  (Read 373 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tracey
Administrator
Snap happy
*****
Posts: 751


chief cook and bottle washer


WWW
« on: November 06, 2009, 08:19:28 PM »

Someone on my OU course has brought my attention to this

http://www.ipo.gov.uk/c-strategy-digitalage.pdf

and the UK petition http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/copyrightreform/#detail

Quote
We call on the Government to abandon plans, announced on 29 October 2009, to allow free and unhindered reproduction of photographs without payment or credit on non-commercial websites.

This is completely at odds with the Government's stance on file sharing of other forms of intellectual property (films and music) and raises the prospect of crippling thousands of small businesses while protecting large corporate interests.

The proposal uses phrases like "It must be seen to benefit all parties, not some at the expense of others" and yet the Government's proposal does exactly that. It takes the work of photographers who have invested time and money in creating work, and gives it to people who have no relationship with that work, for free.

What does that mean for people like us? Will this mean anyone will be free to take any photo we upload anywhere on the internet and use it whenever/wherever they want? Would it mean that if this bill goes ahead, someone could take an image I have posted somewhere, download it, edit it as they see fit (or leave it in tact,) and then pass that image off as their own? Or am I misunderstanding some/all of the reading I have done?
Logged

trying to make sense of it all confused
Hedgehog
Global Moderator
Snap happy
****
Posts: 298


Wanna see my Canon?


WWW
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2009, 09:19:17 AM »

I'm gonna have to look into this further... they couldn't pass your image off as their own (that would be fraud) & I doubt that they are making it legal to make money from it without paying you a royalty or seeking permission (i.e. use it for advertising)... it probably means that for personal/journalistic/web/in-house presentation level use you don't have to get the poster's permission to use an uploaded photo. Not sure how comfortable I am with that... as I said I will investigate.
Logged

XP sp3 IE 8, Vista IE8/FF 3.0.11
50D, 350D, ef50 1.8, efs10-22, Sigma 30 1.4, Tamron 18-200
Reminder... Jonesy's bananas... & nuts!
Tracey
Administrator
Snap happy
*****
Posts: 751


chief cook and bottle washer


WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2009, 12:36:36 PM »

Please do investigate, I'd like to know what some law like that might do to a young site like this, as well as a site like Flikr. Would people simply stop posting... I hope not, as I find inspiration in others photos, they show me things to go and try to do for myself... as well as giving me a goal to aim for (quality wise)
Logged

trying to make sense of it all confused
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to: